Peace Talks Must Include Jewish Refugee Demands

Much of the attention given to the Israel-Palestiner situation ignores half of the problem of the refugees-- the fact that the Arabs stole the Jews land--- andpossessions-- and so on. They should be compensated-- at the very least!

But is there really equality here? Would it be right to equate the Palestinian refugees from Israel with the Jews from Arab/Muslim lands? In most cases the land, possessions, accounts and businesses of the Jews in Arab lands were confiscated and the Jews were booted out of those countries. Some may have left on their own accord while not under such conditions and I suppose they would have sold what they owned first, but if they sold their lands and possessions under any duress or were forced to accept reduced compensation then that also must be considered. What about the Jews who were murdered leaving no relative behind entitled to compensation?

The question I first posed above is to consider whether Israel did in fact force the Muslims/Arabs from their homes at the time of partition or later, or was it simply because they did not want to live in a Jewish country, or were ordered to leave by their brethren, and left voluntarily?

There are many factors to take into consideration.

It is interesting that so many Jews remain in Morocco as compared with other Arab/Muslim countries. In that case the King of Morocco was in support of their remaining there.